Unite against abuse of power and authority!

Select your language

Thoughtful:

In a civilized society, we can have different opinions and still be friends.

Per Hanson

Image: Freepik.com

The EU's financial weaponization has backfired. Resulting in massive capital flight from European assets, euro depreciation, rising borrowing costs for EU governments, and the accelerated collapse of the euro's reserve currency credibility.

The European Union just made a catastrophic mistake.

[. . .]

Every country with reserves in European financial institutions had to reconsider their safety. If the EU would seize Russian assets, what stops them from seizing Chinese assets if tensions escalate over Taiwan? or Saudi assets if there's another oil dispute or any nation's assets in a future conflict. The answer, nothing stops them.

[. . .]

Central banks move slowly. But the direction became clear. Reduce European exposure. Increase holdings in jurisdictions with stronger property rights protections or less geopolitical ambition. Ironically, this included increasing holdings in Switzerland, neutral, Singapore, pragmatic, and even China, which now looked safer than Europe for non-western reserves. The European Union's aggressive use of financial warfare made European assets less attractive globally.

[. . .]

The sanctions and asset seizures were supposed to weaken Russia. Instead, they accelerated Russia's pivot away from Europe and integration with non western economies.

[. . .]

For 80 years, the postworld war II financial system operated on certain principles:

  • Respect for sovereign property rights
  • Sanctity of central bank reserves
  • Political neutrality of financial infrastructure.

These principles were never perfectly upheld, but they were strong enough to maintain confidence in the system. The Russian asset seizure shattered these principles explicitly. Central bank reserves are no longer sacrosanked. They can be frozen and seized if the political climate supports it. Property rights are conditional. They depend on maintaining acceptable relations with Western powers. Financial infrastructure is weaponized. Swift custody systems and payment networks are tools of geopolitical competition. Once these principles are broken, they can't be easily restored.

[. . .]

This is how empires decline. Not through single catastrophic defeats, but through accumulated strategic mistakes that seem small at the time, but compound into disaster.

[. . .]

All of it resulted from choices made by European leaders who prioritized short-term political gains over long-term strategic thinking. Russia's response shocked Europe because European leaders didn't think it through. They assumed Western financial dominance was permanent, that sanctions and seizures could be imposed without consequence, that Russia had no effective retaliation options. They were wrong on all counts, and Europe will pay the price for this miscalculation for decades to come.

Log in to comment
Editor replied the topic:
11 hours 19 minutes ago
The problem with the Euro

When we look at the structure of the Euro, it becomes clear that the design was flawed from the outset because of a failure to understand what MONEY really is.
[. . .]
There  is  simply  no  precedent  for  such  an  economic system of a Single Currency creating in theory a Monetary Union absent a Single Fiscal Debt Union. This type of fast and loose economic structure is from another planet. There is no enforcement mechanism whatsoever to compel member states to curtail their budgets yet the bonds they issue are of the equivalent of a federal nature. This is as if a federal government allows foreign states to print its MONEY at will. In the USA, state and local debt is NOT federal and cannot serve as RESERVE status increasing the money supply. No does the threat of one state threaten the federal debt. Hence, without serious reform, there can be no credible solution. Creating bailout funds do not solve the problem and only kicks the can down the road. This is why there must be FIRST a consolidation of ALL member state national debts. There is no mechanism to enforce fiscal policy at the  member state level. Consolidating the debt will restrict bank RESERVES to only federal debt and this will also stabilize the banking system.
[. . .]
The euro DID NOT ELIMINATE by any means the member state REAL currency movement as believed most assumed it would accomplish from the outset. The free market will always respond to any such change. In this manner, it was logical that the  bond market of each member state would simply become the  tradable virtual constructive currency derivative that in effect provides the SAME impact as the old currency would have accomplished. A currency rises and falls based upon CONFIDENCE in the political government underling that instrument. Creating the euro, BUT leaving each nation with its sovereign debt converted to euro, left intact the SAME underlying element of separate and distinct political risk. To someone like me, I see the inherent currency component that remains and thus I can create a hedge against the political risk by now SHORTING the euro bonds of that member state creating the same identical Virtual Currency performance had the drachma, lira, peso, or even the German mark still traded.

www.armstrongeconomics.com/research/the-euro/the-rise-fall-of-the-euro

Advertisement:

Information