Unite against abuse of power and authority!

Select your language

Article Index

The US new National Security Strategy

US National Security Strategy

 

you're [Europe] anti-American by definition. And this is the national security strategy of the United States that seeks to promote American security interests. So don't be surprised that we've turned against Europe. And this is a fundamental turn. This isn't you know a little lover's spat. This isn't a quarrel that will be papered over. This is of a fundamental nature. Europe is on a pathway according to the Trump administration to civilizational erasure. That means you're gone. You're doing it to yourself. We have decided that we will try to get those European nations, not the European Union, not the European community, those European nations that are worth saving on the right trajectory. But NATO is finished. I hope people understand that too because the Trump administration has said there are members of NATO today who don't reflect the cultural values um and realities of the nations that signed the charter and therefore they are incompatible with what we believe should be defensed under the charter.

[. . .]

Europe better wake the hell up because America's waking up. We're sick and tired of sending money your way of saving your asses only to have you sit there and spit in our face. Look, there's ways to criticize America. We deserve to be criticized. We are not perfect. We have done a lot of things wrong. And there I have no problem with pe people holding us to account. But when you owe your very existence to the blood of Americans, you better bite your tongue when you start to say certain things. or don't be surprised when we turn around and hold you to account. And that's what's happening today. You are being held to account by a generation of Americans who are tired of playing the game. We're not going to underwrite your security with a blank check anymore and we're not going to stand by idly while you plot against us.

[. . .]

Russia was a partner of stability. And therefore, anything that seeks to undermine this strategic decision to be have a stable relationship with Russia becomes the enemy. And Germany, you're now the enemy. You're the official enemy of the United States. Get used to it. France, the same thing. I mean, Macron actively conspiring against the United States right now. Starmer, the same thing. I mean, there was a rumor going out that they're talking about divesting themselves of American treasuries. Play the game. Really? I mean, there's the old fool around and then you will find out. We will crush you. We will destroy you. That will be the end of Europe.

[. . .]

NATO can't have a large scale military exercise without the United States involvement. We're not going to be involved. We're going to start to withdraw a whole bunch of critical support to NATO while we still be in NATO. We're just going to tell the Europeans, you gota you got to do it. Europe can't do it. Europe doesn't have logistical infrastructure that can unify Europe. They don't have a communications framework that can unify Europe. They were relying on the United States for this forever. Um and so then as Europe starts to collapse, the expense of sustaining uh NATO without the United States uh becomes prohibitive and nations are going to opt out, especially when the United States offers them bilateral security arrangements. And this is what's going to be the end of NATO when the United States moves away from collective security. And we already have. Scott Bessett made it clear that if Russia attacks NATO, we're not going to come screaming in with troops. We'll be willing to sell you some equipment. Maybe that's it. Of course, that's all that's required under Article 5. People haven't read it very closely if they think that it automatically requires us to send troops in. But we're done with that. So we are getting to a situation where if a European nation behaves irresponsibly and provokes Russia and Russia attacks it that there isn't going to be a collective response by NATO because NATO can't collectively respond without the United States and we're opting out of that. We we view Europe as an irresponsible entity right now.

Bill to Remove the United States from NATO

“NATO is a Cold War relic. We should withdraw from NATO and use that money to defend our own country, not socialist countries,” said Rep. Thomas Massie. “NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union, which collapsed over thirty years ago. Since then, U.S. participation has cost taxpayers trillions of dollars and continues to risk U.S. involvement in foreign wars. Our Constitution did not authorize permanent foreign entanglements, something our Founding Fathers explicitly warned us against. America should not be the world’s security blanket—especially when wealthy countries refuse to pay for their own defense.”

massie.house.gov - Rep. Massie Introduces Bill to Remove the United States from NATO

 

Log in to comment
Per Hanson replied the topic:
2 months 19 hours ago
Follow the money!

As he boarded the night train to Ukraine,  Boris Johnson  had the usual entourage of aides and bodyguards – plus the man who had given him £1m

Less than a year had passed since Johnson accepted what is thought to be the largest donation ever to an individual MP. It was from Christopher Harborne, one of the UK’s biggest and most private political donors.

Harborne, whose millions helped bankroll Brexit, made the payment to a private company Johnson set up after resigning as prime minister. Now leaked files show that Johnson, a champion of Ukraine in office and since, was accompanied in September 2023 by his benefactor on a two-day visit that included meetings with top officials.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/10/the-1m-man-why-did-boris-johnson-take-his-donor-to-ukraine

Editor replied the topic:
3 weeks 16 hours ago
Vast amount of money lost to corruption!

the latest revelation has been a hundred million dollar payback scheme that was engineered by one of Zelinsky's close associates. And when that came up, that was about a week ago, maybe two week almost two weeks ago, it it was brought by the Ukrainian anti-corruption investigators and they have been put into gear mainly because of pressure by the United States. So, so that's kind of the tip of the iceberg. That that's just small potatoes because if we look at the total amount of money that's been pumped into Ukraine since 2022, it's about $360 billion. And out of that, I estimate that the corruption's running be somewhere between 15 and 30% of that. Probably towards the 30% line. That's what the auditors found with the involvement in the United States in Afghanistan. The corruption was running at 30% in Afghanistan. I think it's probably pretty close to that in Ukraine. So we're talking Mike about big bucks. We've got at 15% of the corruption money go lining the pockets of the of the corrupt 54 billion and at 30% it would be 108 billion.

Editor replied the topic:
2 weeks 6 days ago
Kick-backs?

The European leaders are ignorant and are the puppets of NATO. They are too stupid to see that the Neocons are manipulating them. This nonsense that Ukraine should not be split is insane. That was the ONLY way to stop the ethnic killing in Yugoslavia. Czechoslovakia split in two as well. The Minsk Agreement, which even Germany signed, was to allow the Donbas to vote. Merz refusal to honor the word of Germany is dooming Europe to World War III. If they reall want peace, surrender the Donbas. Else, then sacrifice all of Europe to a third world war. There will NEVER be peace with Russia because people like Kallas hate the Russian people.

The only way for Europe to avoid this war is to stand up and demand that they have a say in creating war. European leaders will lie and put Europe at risk for Ukraine, the most corrupt nation on Earth. Zelensky’s Chief of Staff is now implicated in stealing $100 million. How musch more money will the West hand these people to stuff in their private accounts. They never get enough. Are they paying kickbacks to NATO and Europeans leaders?  

www.armstrongeconomics.com  - Is European Leaders Being Manipulated by NATO?

Editor replied the topic:
2 weeks 5 days ago
The destruction of Europe

War is a great way to default on debts. You get to form a new government, and they always disavow the debts of the previous government. Europe has been committing economic suicide. Between the COVID-19 Lockdowns, the NET-ZERO Climate Change, and then the sanctions on Russia that doubled their fuel costs, you could not ask for a more brain-dead group of politicians who have ZERO comprehension of even how the economy functions.

www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/boris-johnson-urges-ukraine-to-continue-war


Advertisement:

Information